This page presents a carefully structured series of Socratic-style questions designed to help a person reflect on whether their beliefs about mercury amalgam safety are rooted in independent scientific evaluation or influenced by societal conformity, institutional trust, or professional norms.
"If mercury is so toxic that it's treated as hazardous waste when removed from your mouth, why is it considered safe to keep it in your mouth for decades?"
This question works because it highlights a contradiction, provokes curiosity, and uses a non-accusatory tone to invite inquiry.
This line of questioning is not about confrontation. It is about guiding the respondent to: